__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Friday 19 May 2006 08:16 \__
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Au79 <au79@xxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> CNET News.com - San Francisco,CA,USA
>>
>> ... Microsoft should do more to protect Windows ... can and should protect
>> the kernel of Windows, make it less vulnerable, and respond more quickly
>> to vulnerabilities. ...
>>
>><http://news.com.com/Beware+the+Microsoft+monoculture/2008-1009_3-6073640.html>
>
> MS presumably need to find any possibility of additional revenue - this
> will involve destroying its remaining partners, I'm sure.
One used to be able to say that Symantec were Microsoft partners, virtually.
Symantec protected that troubled platform and inhibited some users, which
could otherwise run elsewhere.
Now, look where the loveaffair stands.
http://news.com.com/2100-7355_3-6072540.html?part=rss&tag=6072540&subj=news
Symantec CEO advocates Macs
http://news.com.com/1606-2_3-6073553.html?part=rss&tag=6073553&subj=news
Symantec CEO: "Diversity is key to secure infrastructure"
http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-6074055.html?part=rss&tag=6074055&subj=news
Symantec sued Microsoft last night
That's the thank-you for all these years of protecting Windows. Netscaping
them...
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Disk quota exceeded; sig discontinued"
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
9:25am up 21 days 16:22, 10 users, load average: 0.54, 0.71, 0.53
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
