__/ [ Paul B ] on Wednesday 24 May 2006 16:36 \__
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 16:30:22 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [ Paul B ] on Wednesday 24 May 2006 16:18 \__
>>
>>> On Wed, 24 May 2006 15:50:25 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>__/ [ Big Bill ] on Wednesday 24 May 2006 14:29 \__
>>>>
>>>>> On 24 May 2006 05:39:58 -0700, "webseoguy" <webseoguy@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>Actually, Bill, I found his links extremely informative. That said, a
>>>>link to the source rather than a blog citing them would have saved some
>>>>time. It seems as though we may be witnessing an irreversible and
>>>>permanent change, which was /intentional/.
>>>>
>>>>Best wishes,
>>>>
>>>>Roy
>>>
>>> You mean that scraper sites and 404 pages are going to be top SERPs ?
>>> <peter kay>It's the future, I've seen it</peter kay>
>>>
>>> plh
>>> Paul
>>
>>Haven't come across an example, yet. All I know is that I can't do site
>>search, on my *own* site. It is a real nuisance. I used to be able to jump
>>from one part of the site to another using just the search bar.
>
> I've seen a number of 404 at #1 #2 etc in SERPS
> And lately *all* of the google alerts I have received have been for
> scraper sites. (As well as seeing them high in SERPs)
Perhaps a matter of fortune: just after I had posted that last message I
searched for "Palm graphics" (IIRC) and got a 404 at number 1. Needless to
say, I was relieved. This is not what Google intended to achieve. This could
make them lo$e customer$ and Ad$en$e revenue$.
> I just wish that the other DCs could show the same results as :
> 64.233.167.99
> 64.233.167.104
> 64.233.167.147
God bless 'em.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Mod me up and I'll mod you 'insightful'"
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
4:35pm up 26 days 23:07, 11 users, load average: 0.83, 0.80, 0.87
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
|
|
