__/ [ Paul B ] on Monday 22 May 2006 14:26 \__
> On Sat, 20 May 2006 03:28:36 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [ Paul B ] on Friday 19 May 2006 20:58 \__
>>
>>> On Fri, 19 May 2006 16:57:01 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>__/ [ Paul B ] on Friday 19 May 2006 16:53 \__
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:49:06 +0200, Borek
>>>>> <m.borkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:46:56 +0200, Paul B <lamewolf2004@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>I am assuming that "correct" is defined as "the way things used to be",
>>>>which is probably reasonable. Considering the Big Daddy chaos, it is safe
>>>>to say that the way things used to be is the right way... or maybe not...
>>>>
>>>>Your call. *smile*
>>>
>>> Well, i've just checked again, and those DC's have reverted back to
>>> "not found"
>>>
>>> 64.233.167.99
>>> 64.233.167.104
>>> 64.233.167.147
>>>
>>>
>>> oh well, good while it lasted.
>>
>>You mean, as a sanity check? *smile*
>>
>>Best wishes,
>>
>>Roy
>
> 64.233.167.99
> 64.233.167.104
> 64.233.167.147
>
> are back showing results again. Another tease ? may be.
It has very quiet in this forum today. I'll try posting a new item that has
been considered questionable, but hit the Digg front page a few hours ago...
Since many mind the presence of Google, AdSense, and cash, it's likely to
kick off a discussion... *smile*
|
|
