Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: wjbell proven plagiarist - was Re: REPEAT: Well Erik, ...

  • Subject: Re: wjbell proven plagiarist - was Re: REPEAT: Well Erik, ...
  • From: flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:05:21 -0500
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: mariana.trench
  • References: <5go424-ple.ln1@dog.did.it> <HHP3h.6363$B31.953@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <eioh8b$mv7$03$1@news.t-online.com> <LVP3h.6366$B31.2676@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <nu4724-0vh.ln1@dog.did.it> <QU74h.99$IR4.72@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net> <2Xb4h.57$Ky6.44@newsfe11.lga> <pan.2006.11.08.10.27.04.371855@tiscali.co.uk> <reply_in_group-D5F801.06104208112006@news.supernews.com>
  • User-agent: Shysterwitch version 0.99.18.41.03.21-a
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1178893
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:10:42 -0800, Tim Smith wrote:

> In article <pan.2006.11.08.10.27.04.371855@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Interesting how the COLA gang went silent when Roy Schestowitz was caught
>> > pirating a copyrighted graphic image on his commercial web site.
>> > 
>> > In fact the silence was deafening.
>> > 
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/dbb4e98895553672?h
>> > l=en&
>> 
>> He linked to it, as far as I'm aware. He did not claim it was his.
> 
> No, he copied it, but had a link giving credit and pointing to the 
> artist's site.

He didn't have the author's permission to use it and even after being
informed of this, still kept it up on his site for weeks.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index