In comp.os.linux.advocacy chrisv <chrisv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> yttrx wrote:
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Clogwog <BWAHAHAHAAA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> yttrx wrote:
>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Gates on Vista, Linux and more
>>>>>
>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>> Gates: Well, there are many issues here. One is that UNIX has had
>>>>>> a market share on servers for decades, and there's always been a
>>>>>> lot of variety. Under that label--Linux--there's an immense
>>>>>> amount of variety. But, in general, Linux is not nearly as
>>>>>> high-volume as Windows is on servers. But (it's) significant, so
>>>>>> customers want new kinds of interoperability.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've done fantastic things on interoperability. Here, we're doing
>>>>>> virtual machine interoperability. So you can just have a pool of
>>>>>> hardware and applications that use Linux, applications that use
>>>>>> Windows, and just have the VM manage which one needs more
>>>>>> resource, which one is done, which one needs to be restarted.
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>> http://news.com.com/Gates+on+Vista%2C+Linux+and+more/2008-1012_3-6136350.html
>>>>
>>>> Wow, there's a guy who hasnt actually sat down at a windows OR linux
>>>> server ever in his whole life.
>>>>
>>>> Gates is absolutely full of shit on this one. Its an utterly
>>>> useless way of doing things---which explains why without exception,
>>>> every windows and unix engineer I know is right now laughing at him.
>>>
>>> Yes and so your making it quite clear, that you don't know one single
>>> windows and unix engineer, you twatting cocknoodle fartsniffer!
>>
>> "you're".
>
> Lame.
>
"14m3"
-----yttrx
--
http://www.yttrx.net
|
|
