Charles Compton came up with this when s/he headbutted the keyboard a moment
ago in comp.os.linux.advocacy:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> Microsoft warns of 5 "critical" security holes
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | Microsoft Corp. on Tuesday issued five
>> | "critical" security patches to fix flaws in its software
>> | that the company warned could allow attackers to takec
>> | ontrol of a user's computer.
>> `----
>>
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061114/tc_nm/microsoft_security_dc
>>
>> Does you bank have Windows servers...? How about your hospital...?
>>
>> 5 holes.
>>
>> Critical.
>>
>> Unpatched.
>>
>> Exploits 'in the wild'.
>
> How come just about every security alert that I see has "Allowing
> attackers to take control of the system"
>
> Microsoft, please place some better security holes in your system...like
> anytime someone goes to the www.getfirefox.com website they attacked by
> big blue E's jumping from their desktop.
>
> Charles~
Last time a big blue E jumped out at me I was in a nightclub.
I don't remember too much about that night after that...
--
-*- Linux Desktops & Clustering Solutions -*- http://dotware.co.uk
-*- Registered Linux user #426308 -*- http://counter.li.org
-*- Linux is like a wigwam: no Windows, no Gates, and Apache inside.
-*- Disclaimer:
By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that:
1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient"
2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make
such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself
to. In particular, I may quote it on usenet.
3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company.
4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may
be included on your message.
|
|
