Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Percentage of SPAM to Rise to 90%, Comes from Roy Shysterwitch

  • Subject: Re: Percentage of SPAM to Rise to 90%, Comes from Roy Shysterwitch
  • From: Peter KÃhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:05:45 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: SMP
  • References: <1447471.eItu7b2MEv@schestowitz.com> <ekfl8u$nuq$1@aioe.server.aioe.org> <reply_in_group-2FF735.16282527112006@news.supernews.com> <ekg1c1$1d5$1@aioe.org>
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1187401
The racist, liar and software thief Shelly K. (flatfish) nymshifted:


> Tim Smith wrote:
>  > In article <ekfl8u$nuq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  >  "Shelly K." <shelly@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >
>  >>Message-ID: <d6a51u$95v$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  >>
>  >>"To filter messages for that account I use a boxtrapper, which works
> like a
>  >>charm. This involves sending a verification request E-mail to anyone
>  >>not already in the whitelist. I also run spamassassin (which is free)
>  >>on
> top of
>  >
>  >
>  > So, if spammer X forges innocent user Y's email in a message to Roy,
>  > and it isn't caught by Spamassassin, Roy's software sends an
>  > unsolicited
>  > message to Y.  That's generally considered abuse, and is grounds for
>  > blacklisting on many of the anti-spam lists.
>  >
> 
> 
> Sounds about right Tim.
> 

Certainly, flatfish
 
> 
> I wonder why Shysterwitch no longer posts from Manchester University ?

I wonder why you bring up posts from 1 1/2 years ago
They certainly will not bolster any of your claims
-- 
To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it.
To mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index