On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:51:50 +0100, Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> nrballardco@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> DFS wrote:
>>>> Linonut wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> Can it really be this bad?
>>>>
>>>> It's never as bad as a cola Linux "advocate" says it is. Never.
>>>
>>> Based on what? Your say-so? Roy S. has recent news articles to
>>> support his claim against Vista. What do you have?
>>
>> Based on the thousands of lying posts they've submitted to cola.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> Rex Ballard, Roy S., Peter Kohlmann, Jim, Gidget, et al, are huge
>>>> liars. Not supported doesn't mean the product won't install and run
>>>> - it may or may not. Not supported means no official support from
>>>> MS.
>>>
>>> And the fact that MS doesn't "officially support" its own products on
>>> its own OS says a lot...
>>
>> You mean some of its own products on some of its own OS's. What are you
>> expecting? Perpetual support of all products on all OS's? It's a
>> software business - not an open source software charity.
>>
>> XP is over 5 years old - yet Suse ended support of 8.0 Home in June 2004,
>> just two years after introducing it. I doubt you can find any Linux
>> organizations offering official support for 5 years.
>
> So you have never looked at a Redhat or Novell site
I just did....
Looks like Suse is ending support for 9.2...
Two years after it was released.....
Sad....
That was one of the last versions that actually worked, unlike 10.1.
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3645456
|
|