Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ Andrea ] on Tuesday 21 November 2006 23:46 \__
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> Red Hat Doesn't Want Mono
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | There are a lot of great new programs and innovations expected
>>> | in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. The Novell-led Mono project isn't
>>> | one of them.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3644981
>>>
>>> I hope that Ubuntu (Canonical) follows suit. Some say that Mono, if not
>>> OpenOffice as well, is a/the legal landmine.
>> Seems like a paranoia.
>
> What's your take on this one?
>
I think that mono, although designed to be .Net compatible is not .Net
itself.
Same situation was long time ago, at the birthtime of PC - patented by
IBM proprietary bios, and compatible solutions from Phoenix, AMI and
Award come to mind. I don't remember any problems caused by that situation.
--
Andrea |ASRock K7Upgrade-880, AMD Sempron 2800+, Pentagram QC-80Cu
1024MB DDR-400, Sapphire Radeon 9600 128MB, Samsung SyncMaster 960BF
Seagate 380021A 80GB, WDC 2000JS 200GB, Sony DW-Q28A, ModeCom 350GTF
|
|
