On 4 Oct 2006 17:54:51 -0700, Larry Qualig wrote:
>> These are symbolic figures, but nonetheless...
>
> It's pathetic what passes for "advocacy" these days.
>
> For starters read Microsoft's annual SEC filings and you'll see that
> operating expenses increased last year because of "increased employee
> salaries" - Raises... not paycuts.
Not to mention that executive salaries tend to be based on performance of
the company as a whole, while employee salaries are based on performance of
the individual. You can't compare the two. On top of that, Microsoft's
executives have always had some of the lowest salaries for large companies
(not counting Job's $1 salary scam)
|
|
