Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: FAQ and Primer for COLA, Edition III

  • Subject: Re: FAQ and Primer for COLA, Edition III
  • From: Peter KÃhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:16:47 +0200
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: SMP
  • References: <7p93v3-1e5.ln1@dog.did.it> <f324v3-plv.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk> <1847155.RfIMtdB8Wd@schestowitz.com> <reply_in_group-ACB757.10273001102006@news.supernews.com>
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1163059
Tim Smith wrote:

> In article <1847155.RfIMtdB8Wd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Tim appears to feel confused. Why would /anybody/ who opposes Linux post
>> here? It's like entering MacDonald's to argue with the staff and demand
>> some burrito.
> 
> If they didn't post here, they would be posting on the other
> comp.os.linux.* groups.  This group was created to try to pull those
> posts away from those groups.  You can read all about it by following
> the discussion that led to the group's creation, available on Google.
> 
> This is no different than the *.advocacy groups that came before COLA,
> or the ones that came after.
> 

Which does not hamper in any way whatsover flatfish or this
imbecile "linux-sux" to post their drivel all over those other groups.
Especially flatfish likes to include the suse-groups and colm into his
crossposts, with liberal additions of other, totally unrelated groups
-- 
This problem was sponsored by Microsoft


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index