begin oe_protect.scr
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Saturday 30 September 2006 16:18 \__
>
>> begin oe_protect.scr
>> Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Mark Kent belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>> Mr Quark is no more able to define spam correctly than he does
>>>> plagiarisation or copyright violation. However, he accuses Roy of all
>>>> of these. One has to conclude that Roy is doing a fantastic job, in
>>>> order to be getting all this attention.
>>>
>>> It was amazing how fast Nardoh devolved.
>
>
> He has got a floppy. Disk.
>
>
>> I'll confess to having be taken somewhat by surprise by the rapidity of
>> the decline, too.
>
>
> Drugs don't work forever. But that's not what is promised by SPAM that
> arrives from Windows botnets.
>
> To think that I was polite to that guy at first...
It's probably better to take that approach, although I have to say that
I tend to look to spot troll-like language in every message, and if I'm
even suspicious, I'll often say so. Genuine posters react differently
to trolls in this situation - genuine ones are usually a little offended
but recover and accept an apology. The trolls however immediately spout
off in a load of anti-linux and anti-cola diatribes, often listing
detailed names of who posts and their history, even though they claim
this be their first or second posting - it's pretty in-your-face stuff.
Mr Quark came into the latter category, afairc.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
1 1 was a race-horse, 2 2 was 1 2. When 1 1 1 1 race, 2 2 1 1 2.
|
|
