On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:15:49 -0500, Linonut wrote:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:35:10 -0500, Linonut wrote:
>>
>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>>> Firefox 2.0 to Feature New JavaScript 1.7
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Firefox_20_to_Feature_New_JavaScript_17/1160795703
>>>>
>>>> Firefox adopts new non-standard version of ECMA-script. Claims it's
>>>> supporting standards.
>>>
>>> Man, Javascript is the Achille's heel of FireFox 2.0 (rc2). I have it
>>> turned off right now for 2.0 (I leave it on in 1.0.7, though).
>>>
>>> Is there really a Javascript standard? And, if so, is it meaningful?
>>
>> Yes, ECMA-Script, which is also known as ISO/IEC 16262. It's approved by
>> internationally accepted standards bodies.
>
> Yeah, but is it meaningful?
So you're saying that ISO standards are not meaningful?
|
|
