> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:39:45 -0500,
> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:30:50 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> Best to ignore her, her 47 cats will likely get jealous, and they
>> can be very vindictive. On the bright side, the fact that she's
>> forming coherent sentances might be a good sign that she's
>> recovering from the brain damage.
> Wow! Either Erik is slinking to even lower depths, or someone's
> stolen his computer and is posting meesages from it.
Erik slunk to much lower depths years ago. He just does it more often
> Quick, "Erik" where does NTFS store it's journal? on what
Even if he had the guts to answer, which he hasn't, it isn't so much
where NTFS stores its journal but the fact he criticised ext3 for
storing it on the same partition as the filesystem. The fact that ext3
can store its journal on any partition was what silenced poor Erik.
Shock horror for Erik. Yet another case of Linux doing something
better than his beloeved Windows.
Security is one of those funny things. You can talk about being "more"
secure, but there's no such thing. A vulnerability is a vulnerability, and
even one makes you just as insecure as anyone else. Security is a binary
condition, either you are or you aren't. - Funkenbusch 1 Oct 2006