In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Sinister Midget
<phydeaux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:22:57 GMT
<bpq504-c8a.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 2006-10-13, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>> __/ [ Roy Culley ] on Friday 13 October 2006 23:57 \__
>>
>>> begin risky.vbs
>>> <17gq6s4j53zss.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:24:21 +0200, Roy Culley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> begin risky.vbs
>>>>> <1jkud0ahgkv4s.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:42:59 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>| [snip]
>>>>>>>|
>>>>>>>| Symbian 75%; Linux 14%; Microsoft 5%; Palm 5%.
>>>>>>>|
>>>>>>>| [snip]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does any of this have to do with Linux?
>>>>>
>>>>> Clearer now?
>>>>
>>>> As mud.
>>>
>>> Well at least we have cleared up whether you are a genius. Must be
>>> tough being an idiot.
>>
>> I think it's an imposter. I never thought Erik could act so foolishly.
>
> You haven't been around long enough to see Erik in his natural state,
> then.
Thank you, that's a vista I'd just as soon not have had to endure... :-)
As opposed to that other Vista, which we'll have to put up with for
awhile.
>
> He's doing what he does best. That's playing 100% shill for MS, no
> matter how silly, no matter how childish, no matter how stupid he has
> to appear. Except he's not playing. And the appearance part isn't
> contrived, or something he simply accepts as the price for being a
> shill.
>
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
New Technology? Not There. No Thanks.
|
|
