begin risky.vbs
<NHTXg.637$Tc5.24@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:29:18 +0200, Roy Culley wrote:
>
>> begin risky.vbs
>> <vjuwoy95anqx.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:33:41 -0400, flatfish+++ wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>
>> I thought quark had it sown up but now it is a 3 way race. Well done
>> Erik and flatty for providing competition. My vote is for flatty. At
>> least Erik 'innovated' his quote every [News] post with a one or 2
>> word followup. Flatty just copied it. Shame on you flatty, you must
>> try harder.
>
> I'd say it's a 4-way tie between:
Aye, yer right lassie, I forgot wjbell has returned.
--
Security is one of those funny things. You can talk about being "more"
secure, but there's no such thing. A vulnerability is a vulnerability, and
even one makes you just as insecure as anyone else. Security is a binary
condition, either you are or you aren't. - Funkenbusch 1 Oct 2006
|
|
