Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Vista Cannot Be Run Virtualised...

  • Subject: Re: [News] Vista Cannot Be Run Virtualised...
  • From: Rick <none@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:31:19 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <fLLXg.919$wf1.573@newsfe11.lga>
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
  • References: <1322144.o6rPtmfH3f@schestowitz.com> <fLLXg.919$wf1.573@newsfe11.lga>
  • User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1167536
flatfish+++ wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:04:47 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

...Unless you pay a lot of money.

Microsoft Vista licence restrictions hit hardware hard

,----[ Quote ]
| While the expensive versions of Vista, Vista Ultimate and Vista Business,
| can be installed within a Virtual Machine environment, Vole forbids you
| from doing so with the cheaper Vista Home Basic and Vista Home Premium.
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=35057

Another way of punishing/suppressing users of VMWare, Xen, Parallels, Boot
Camp...

meanwhile, on the dual-boot front:

Vista scoots to new boot, but it's still kinda rooted

,----[ Quote ]
| While Microsoft would like the world to believe that anyone running Windows | has no need of any other operating system, that attitude doesn't cut much | mustard with many of its users.
`----


http://www.apcstart.com/site/akidman/2006/09/1656/vista-scoots-to-new-boot-but-its-still-kinda-rooted

So, essentially, Microsoft now owns your hardware and controls the way it is
being used. Not to mention DRM for your data, WGA, and TC...


Another pro linux post

... letting us know that Micorsoft wants to stop us from --paying-- for a copy of Vista and running it under Linux.


--
Rick

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index