On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:29:11 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
> Bobbie <bobbie4R3MOV3TH1S@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:58:02 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
>>
>>> Bobbie <bobbie4R3MOV3TH1S@xxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:18:43 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:32:24 +0000, Martha Adams wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I remember what usenet was twenty years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yet you're still using a POS to post.
>>>>>> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My blocked sender list includes idiots & wintrolls. Congrats, you've made
>>>>>> the list:
>>>>>> ^From:.*Martha Adams
>>>>>
>>>>> Got to admire Willy Boaster and his killfile prowess. Go Willy! Filter
>>>>> all people who use the worlds most prevalent News Reader!!!!
>>>>
>>>> Even you have to be able to find the fallacy in that statement. If you're
>>>> not willing to go so far as use Linux when posting to a Linux advocacy
>>>> group you've got no reason to complain.
>>>
>>> Holy moley. You really believe that don't you?
>>>
>>> People come here to hear good things about Linux - to be convinced to
>>> convert to Linux. And idiots like Kohlmann and Willy Boaster go on witch
>>> hunts because those interested posters are using Windows? You think this
>>> is good advocacy? It is madness.
>>>
>>> If someone goes to a new car showroom to buy a Porsche, does he drive up
>>> in a brand new Porsche? Nope.
>>>
>>> Get a clue.
>>
>> I've got a clue, but you don't seem to.
>
> You smell ... how old are you?
Hey, only certain people get to stick there nose back there. You're not
one of them. Go sniff flattie.
>
>> Looks like the clue train pulled out of the station while you were in the
>> can taking a dump.
>
> Ah yes. Advocacy at its best.
>
>>
>> Advocacy does not equal selling.
>> Advocacy does not equal spinning the sale either.
>
> Which is why I'm amazed you seem to be so keen to lie about
> Linux's failings.
Where have I lied? Give it your best shot.
> I can be honest about the cracks in the OS I use, why
> can't you?
>
Care to point out where I haven't been?
>>
>> I'll leave it up to you to get a clue and discover the true meaning of
>> advocacy.
>
> Advocacy \Ad"vo*ca*cy\, n. [OF. advocatie, LL. advocatia. See
> Advocate.]
> The act of pleading for or supporting; work of advocating;
> intercession.
> [1913 Webster]
>
Advocacy, noun. support or argument for a cause, policy,
etc.
>From page 13 of the 1996 Oxford Dictionary.
No where is advocacy implied that nothing negative is stated for the other
side. Or maybe you thought that arguments only had one side.
> To advocate something is not the same as denigrating something
> else. Think about it. If you can.
So what happened to your point about COLA needing to be a Porche dealship?
Y
--
Bobbie the Triple Killer
http://members.shaw.ca/bobbie4/index.htm
email Bobbie @ bobbie4R3MOV3TH1S@xxxxxxx
remember to 'remove this'
Bobbie recently switched to Ubuntu 6.
Why? Cause he can, that's why.
|
|
