Jamie Hart wrote:
>tjb wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> I don't want to have to killfile all of your news posts, because I want to
>>> read *some* of them.
>>
>> Just to add that he does post some really good ones. This is why I'm so
>> hesitant on killfiling here. The problem is the sheer quantity of the
>> posts.
>
>Buy a clue. If he cuts down the volume, he may well cut out something
>you'd want to see.
>
>I don't killfile any of the news posts, just skim through them to see if
>there's anything I want to read, then I mark them all read and they
>magically disappear from view.
>
>Takes a couple of minutes at the most.
Sort of what I do - I just highlight (most of) them all and delete
them. This allows a quick scan for anything interesting but gets rid
of a lot of clutter.
|
|
