Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Beta of the Next Ubuntu Linux Reviewed

  • Subject: Re: [News] Beta of the Next Ubuntu Linux Reviewed
  • From: Jamie Hart <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:50 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <c7wvblqox7bm.dlg@funkenbusch.com>
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <1816920.IMNZSogG7c@schestowitz.com> <c7wvblqox7bm.dlg@funkenbusch.com>
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1166700
Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:27:03 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

ReviewLinux.Com: Will Ubuntu 6.10 Beta finally make me think about switching?

,----[ Quote ]
| In conclusion,  I am so used to using KDE and the GNOME desktop
| may take me a while to get used too.  I do know one thing,  the Ubuntu
| 6.10 Beta update manager works flawlessly and that alone may be enough to
| convince me to switch.
`----

http://www.reviewlinux.com/?m=show&id=3456

So, in other words, the 6.06 update manager does NOT work flawlessly.

Do you have to be so clueless?

They author is thinking of switching from Xandros.

And before you try your usual weasel, he doesn't mention trying 6.06 at all.

So, to summarise, Ubuntu 6.10 has an update manager that works flawlessly and Eric Funkenbusch is a lying weasel.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index