In article <p96p04-st7.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
> > The Windows EULA forbids side-by-side comparisons as well.
>
> In order for any part of the EULA to be enforcable, doesn't one need to
> actually USE the product?
[Dammit...hit the wrong button. Hey, Spike...if your email address is
not munged, you'll be getting a copy of the first draft of this via
email. Sorry about that!]
More importantly, for such a clause to be enforceable, it would have to
exist.
> How can they enforce a "No benchmark/side by side comparison" type
> restriction on something like PRICE?
They aren't even trying to do something like that. You've made the
mistake of accepting assertions in a Roy post on their face. That's not
a wise strategy.
--
--Tim Smith
|
|
