Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> A Contract Only Microsoft Can Break
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
<SNIP>
> | The real point here though is just how absurd it is talk about software
> | EULAs as if they were real contracts. An agreement that one side can go
> | back on at any time is no agreement at all. That is the real plain
> | English message of the Windows XP EULA - if only a few more judges
> | would get it.
> `----
>
http://weblog.infoworld.com/gripeline/archives/2006/09/a_contract_only.html
That is an interesting revelation:
| EVEN IN THE EVENT OF THE FAULT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE),
| MISREPRESENTATION, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR BREACH OF
| WARRANTY OF MICROSOFT OR ANY SUPPLIER, AND EVEN IF MICROSOFT OR ANY
| SUPPLIER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
They are not liable for their misrepresentations.
--
HPT
|
|
