__/ [ David ] on Sunday 03 September 2006 03:54 \__
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 06:55:25 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>I can't recall if it was Cutts or DiBona (I searched, but couldn't find it
>>after a 2-minute effort) who said that Google's broken code is intended to
>>make pages more compact and thus quick to deliver. This sounds like utter
>>BS to me because if standards are compromised for speed, then developers
>>will design for IE just because the majority of people use it. Principles
>>and /ad hoc/ workarounds that supersede them are unacceptable. Maybe we
>>should also start throwing bottle out the car's windows. You know, because
>>it's quicker...
>>
>>Best wishes,
>>
>>Roy
>
> Yeah, I always thought it was because Google didn't have the SEO
> skills needed to optimise their code for better rankings etc..., they
> probably use Dreamweaver or something :-)
Google doesn't need to optimise. That's like God praying to God. *smile*
|
|
