On or about 2006-09-16 Saturday 12:52, I did witness the following events
concerning Roy Schestowitz:
> __/ [ Jim ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 12:18 \__
>
>> On or about 2006-09-16 Saturday 01:16, I did witness the following events
>> concerning Roy Schestowitz:
>>
>>> __/ [ Jim ] on Friday 15 September 2006 02:16 \__
>>>
>>>> On or about 2006-09-14 Thursday 12:10, I did witness the following
>>>> events concerning Roy Schestowitz:
>>>>
>>>>> __/ [ Jim ] on Thursday 14 September 2006 02:26 \__
>>>>>
>>>>>> On or about 2006-09-13 Wednesday 20:49, I did witness the following
>>>>>> events concerning Mark Kent:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> begin oe_protect.scr
>>>>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>>>> IBM begins selling Cell blades
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>>>>| Unlike IBM blades with Big Blue's Power processors, Intel's Xeon
>>>>>>>>| or Advanced Micro Devices' Opteron, the Cell blades can't be
>>>>>>>>| intermixed with other varieties in the same BladeCenter chassis.
>>>>>>>>| The systemsr un Red Hat's Fedora Core 5 version of Linux.
>>>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
http://news.com.com/2100-1006_3-6115225.html?part=rss&tag=6115225&subj=news
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a big mistake. Roll on ATCA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I still want 5,000 of those AMD matchox SBCs.
>>>>>
>>>>> 5000 matchboxes? It could get blazingly hot.
>>>>
>>>> I had to think about that one for a minute... well, it is 2am. That's
>>>> my excuse and I'm sticking to it! :)
>>>
>>> So will the SBC! (stick to each other when they melt)
>>>
>>
>> they don't actually put out that much heat (explains the complete lack of
>> heatsinks). Still, I wouldn't build such a system without some sort of
>> ducted airflow system, especially considering the number of processors
>> I'd be putting in it.
>
> And what will you use it for anyway? SETI@home? A powerful machine that's
> work-thirsty-yet-underemployed is a sad machine. Last year I saw a 10,000
> pound server used as a desktop machine by a colleague. And I think she ran
> Windows 2000 on it... to do routine stuff. What a total waste of grant
> money...
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Roy
>
me? I encode video. Having lots of stuff to digitise it'd take forever to do
on one processor. Having a stack of 'em is very handy; right now I can
encode a two hour video from raw DV source to mpeg-2 in a little under four
minutes. Using twelve processors.
--
I hereby testify that the above statement is an accurate recollection of the
events mentioned therein.
http://dotware.co.uk
Registered Linux user #426308 -*- http://counter.li.org
|
|