In comp.os.linux.advocacy, chrisv
<chrisv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:29:47 -0500
<pan.2006.09.15.16.29.47.403830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:56:49 +0100, Kier wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:58:19 -0400, flatfish+++ wrote:
>>>
>>> Remember, the Windows users can use Firefox and Opera as well, but we have
>>> always been able to use IE for sites that do not work well with the other
>>> browsers.
>>>
>>> Now the Linux community apparently can do the same and the hypocrisy rears
>>> it's ugly head.
>>
>> Couldn't give a shit if IE works for Linux, ever, as I won't be using it.
>> And I haven't noticed many people here say otherwise. You're full of shit.
>
> The point of making IE work under Linux was so WebDesigners can easily
> test their code against it, which makes perfect sense.
It might make more sense if IE actually hewed 100% to
documented W3C *standards*, but I'll admit it's nice to run
IE on Linux rather than to have to flip to XP on this box,
and get an occasional good laugh ("ye gods, that page got
mangled!").
Also, our internal bugsystem does not like Mozzie. Grump.
>
> Flatshit claiming that this is "hypocrisy" just proves, again, that he's a
> filthy liar.
>
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
|
|
