Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: More Linux Hypocrisy From Roy Schestowhich

  • Subject: Re: More Linux Hypocrisy From Roy Schestowhich
  • From: ed <ed@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:44:54 GMT
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.os.windows-xp
  • Organization: NTL
  • References: <sogOg.31$%W2.2@newsfe10.lga>
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1154554 comp.os.linux.misc:632970 alt.os.windows-xp:450093
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:34:44 -0400
flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Linux nutsacks love to pick on Internet Explorer for all kinds of
> reasons, most of them jealousy because they know that the vast
> majority of web sites are designed to work well with Internet Explorer
> because it is the # 1 browser.

Two mistakes here, those sites are:

  1. not designed
  2. do not work well

How can a site that is 'designed' work well when it renders only in one
browser, to me, and most designers, it is a contradiction.

If a site is designed then it will be compliant with standards.

> So why are they squealing with joy when they can now run Internet
> Explorer under Linux (actually under Whino and Linux) ?

We don't want to run a piece of shite to just see a webpage. No. Nuh ah.

> Total hypocrites these LIEnix fanatics are.

Fuck off and think before you post such rants.

-- 
Regards, Ed                      :: http://s5h.net/u?l
proud bash hacker
Diesel in the mornin', Diesel in the evenin', Diesel at suppertime! 
When Vin Diesel's on a bagel, he will kill you. 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index