Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Who here advocates open source but develops closed source for pay?

  • Subject: Re: Who here advocates open source but develops closed source for pay?
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:19:03 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / ISBE, Manchester University / ITS / Netscape / MCC
  • References: <O8KNg.297$tR2.257@bignews2.bellsouth.net> <iZmdnbGeyqYNEJrYnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@comcast.com> <avjkt3-rig.ln1@sky.matrix>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ [H]omer ] on Wednesday 13 September 2006 07:10 \__

> Geico Caveman wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>> 
>>> I know John Bailo does.  Rex Ballard.  Ian Hilliard.  Thad.  Linonut.
>>> [H]omer.  Peter Jensen.  Ghost.
> 
> I am not a (professional) developer; I /was/ a consultant, and the
> solutions I provided were not developed by me; I merely implemented them.
> 
> The vast majority of those solutions involved the deployment of Open
> Source Software (e.g. LAMP), and the few proprietary solutions were
> usually custom designed for vertical integration, and never resold.
> 
> I advocate Open Source because I have the benefit of years of
> experience, witnessing first hand the vast difference the implementation
> of FOSS has, on the productivity and profitability of any company, or
> individual, who adopts it. Unlike those who advocate proprietary
> software, because they're being paid to do so.
> 
>>> Is there ANYBODY here that both advocates and develops only open source?
> 
>> I, among others.
> 
> What little /development/ I *have* done, has *always* been FOSS.
 
All my work is (always been) GPL'd. And its has financial backing.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index