Hasta la Vista, part 3: Of Windows security and other oxy-morons
,----[ Quote ]
| Exhibit one. Where was the news coverage of Linux in 1999? Most people
| -- including me -- were still thinking it was an experimental, command
| line driven system.
|
| [...]
|
| Exhibit two. Linux coverage in the Netherlands has been abysmal, to say
| the least.
|
| [...]
|
| Still, I can laugh about such ignorance, until blatant lies pop up.
| Linux just seems more secure, because there are so few of them. That is
| FUD. And if you're a competent editor, you know it is FUD. Why? Well,
| when it comes to web servers, the biggest target is Apache, the
| Internet's server of choice, even after attempts of Microsoft to bring
| its share down.
|
| [...]
|
| We've come full circle here. In the next and final part of this series
| I'll be delving in the dark, murky dungeons of Windows backdoors. Don't
| believe they are there? I'd be most surprised if they weren't there and
| so will you.
`----
http://thebeez.vnunetblogs.com/the_beez_speaks/2006/09/hasta_la_vista__2.html
|
|
