__/ [ B Gruff ] on Monday 25 September 2006 19:45 \__
> On Monday 25 September 2006 19:12 Richard Rasker wrote:
>
>> Op Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:58:23 +0100, schreef Roy Schestowitz:
>>
>>> __/ [ Richard Rasker ] on Monday 25 September 2006 18:53 \__
>>>
>>>> Oops, it seems some SCOX bagholders lost control over certain retainer
>>>> muscles, and let their assets drop below $2 ...
>>>>
>>>> http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SCOX&t=1d&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=
>>>>
>>>> Ah, the wonderful sound of greedy bastards slowly being ground into a
>>>> pulp
>>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Quick! Grab a SLED. Let's go luging.
>>>
>>> http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SCOX&t=3m&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=
>>
>> Nah, with this kind of avalanche hazard? That'd be suicidal. Still, it's a
>> sight of bewildering beauty, almost bringing tears to my eyes, actually
>> seeing natural erosion in action like this ... almost as beautiful as
>> watching this "mountain of code" containing "millions of lines" of
>> "verbatim copied SCO's intellectual property" crumble to what can't even
>> be called a squashed mole hill any more. But then again, the two are
>> related, after all :-)
>
> Ah - but the licences that MS bought are still valid and intact?
> I wouldn't like to think that my friends at MS had lost those millions that
> they paid.....
Not to worry. There's plenty more cash where that all came from.
"There you have it. At least a third of SCO's entire market capitalization,
and their entire current cash reserves, is payoffs funnelled from Microsoft.
Their 10Qs reveal that every other line of cash inflow is statistical noise
by comparison. The brave new SCOsource business model is now clear: sue your
customers, shill for Microsoft, kite your stock, and pray you stay out of
jail."
http://www.catb.org/~esr/halloween/halloween10.html
Too bad that without any allegations there is no vector of attack for that
'sock puppet'.
|
|
