Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: SUSE Suitable for Legacy Hardware

  • Subject: Re: SUSE Suitable for Legacy Hardware
  • From: flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:38:22 -0400
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: mariana.trench
  • References: <1922866.QxZxxlzrsm@schestowitz.com> <9%ERg.7$zY4.4@newsfe12.lga> <m6WdnT7GZvLT3YrYnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@comcast.com>
  • User-agent: Shysterwitch version 0.99.18.41.03.21-a
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1159822
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:34:54 -0500, Linonut wrote:

> After takin' a swig o' grog, flatfish+++ belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> 
>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:57:40 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> Here I am with just 256MB or RAM, KDE, composite enabled, a dozen open
>>> applications (among hundreds that ship with the O/S) in 8 virtual desktop
>>> and everything is so responsive and snappy. It's amazing what one can get
>>> for under 250 bucks, including SUSE preinstalled.
>>
>> Liar.....
> 
> Sounds believable to me.
> 
> I can run Windows in a 256 Mb virtual machine on a 512Mb Linux box, and
> as long as neither OS is doing something intensive, you would barely
> know that the other OS is there.
> 
> Conversely, I'll the same is true if Windows is the host OS.  Haven't
> tried that, though.

You have no idea what you are talking about.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index