Ramon F Herrera wrote:
On Apr 4, 6:46 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please do not port software to Windows!
The key question here is this. What does more damage to Microsoft:
- Open Office for Linux?
- Open Office for Windows?
-Ramon
Or, the fact that all Microsoft.com and MSN.com sites are behind 15,000
Akamai Leased Linux servers, for safety from DDOS and other attacks?
I know that the fact that Google runs GNU/Linux clustered on >100,000
systems, and Hotmail.com has always run FreeBSD, are all indictments of
the M$ failure to launch in the server market.
Simply put, "114,000 Microsoft Virus Definitions" says more than
anything about where your energy and resources will be expended.
I don't run multiple-convicted-felon Microsoft's products and adamantly
remind all customers and clients that it will cost them more for total
cost of ownership just for the high labor resources expended to try to
make it work.
I know that if I deal with a business that runs Microsoft, I will be
charged MORE for the products/services that the business provides me.
So, as a wise consumer, I avoid any business that runs multiple
convicted felon Microsoft products.
You wouldn't normally re-enter the alley where you were mugged, in order
to display the watch and ring they didn't take from you in the first
robbery. Why go back for more abuse? Most users of Microsoft are
incompetent in the knowledge and operation of computers, and deserve all
the frustration they paid for! Just do NOT make me pay more, as a
consumer or customer!
I would like to have a penny for every time someone mentioned that the
'dog ate' all their Microsoft Office or Power Point work as they were
creating or saving it!
|
|
