__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Tuesday 03 April 2007 14:55 \__
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> Linux reloaded
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| The software seemed to run faster and smoother on my two-year-old
>>| PC than Windows XP - it definitely runs sweeter than Vista.
>>|
>>| Ubuntu may not be your first choice but it will give you an
>>| up-to-date operating system without forcing you to buy a new PC.
>>| That's neat.
>> `----
>>
>>
http://www.theage.com.au/news/home-office/linux-reloaded/2007/03/31/1174761806748.html
>>
>
> It just keeps coming, doesn't it? In fact, if we consider the evidence
> floating around, the question should probably be "Is Vista better than
> anything?", to which the answer seems likely to be a very resounding
> "no".
Is it better than Windows 2000? Everyone would argue that looks aside (XP can
be enhanced to look like Vista), even XP is better than Vista in almost
every way. Windows is _all about inertia_ at this stage. It's all about
perception as even lockins are wearing out.
--
~~ Best wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Linux: the most popular, but not most widespread
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 22.9% user, 4.8% system, 0.8% nice, 71.6% idle
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
