Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: PCLOS

  • Subject: Re: PCLOS
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:44:59 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Netscape
  • References: <pan.2007.04.11.18.30.03.945427@tiscali.co.uk> <8m10f4-b87.ln1@sky.matrix> <pan.2007.04.11.22.03.34.349047@tiscali.co.uk> <pan.2007.04.11.22.13.50.609505@trollfeed.com> <pan.2007.04.11.22.18.45.817622@tiscali.co.uk>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Kier ] on Wednesday 11 April 2007 23:18 \__

> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:13:51 -0400, Rick wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:03:42 +0100, Kier wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:48:24 +0100, [H]omer wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Kier spake thusly:
>>>>> For those so keen to bury PCLOS before its time, a link to an
>>>>> announcement in their temporary support forum
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://pclossupport.forumsland.com/pclossupport-about2.html
>>>> 
>>>> Nice summary:
>>>> 
>>>>
http://www.mypclinuxos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=1
>>> 
>>> Thanks. Seems my guess was pretty much correct - they got too popular :-)
>>> 
>>> I told Hadron he was talking shite.
>> 
>> He won't admit it. He'll change the subject or try some runaround. Hmmm ..
>> I think I'll take a look at the donation site. I was going to donate if I
>> went to 2007. Maybe I'll just make that decision tonight.
> 
> Was having similar thoughts myself.

Downtime is good then.

-- 
                ~~ With kind regards

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    No SCO code was used to generate this sig
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 128 total,   1 running, 120 sleeping,   0 stopped,   7 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index