Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <26y8dnew93ev$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> First, it did not happen in 1998. It happened in 1997. Second, They did
>> not send out tugs to tow it in to port, the Yorktown had auxillary
>> propulsion systems it used to return under power. Third, The incident was
>> largely blown out of proportion due to misquoting by the Government
>> Computer News magazine.
>>
>> Also, the Yorktown was running an out of date, and obsolete version of the
>> SMCS software with the data safeguards deliberately disabled.
>>
>> http://www.gcn.com/print/17_32/33639-1.html?topic=news
>>
>> From that article:
>>
>> "NT played no role in the YorktownÂs LAN crash, Baker said."
>>
>> Further, the source of the story, Anthony DiGiorgio, claims he was
>> misquoted and never said the things the author claims he said.
>>
>> http://www.gcn.com/print/17_20/33292-1.html
>
> ...and fifth, this has been discussed numerous times in this group. It
> is extremely unlikely that Roy is not aware of the details. Hence, yet
> again, he's posting something he knows is incorrect, because he believes
> that lying is OK if it is a pro-Linux lie.
Roybot Schestowitz is a liar and a spammer. It has been proven time and
time again. I am astonished that "true advocates" can tolerate his
misleading posts due to the poor impression it makes on potential new
recruits to the Linux family..
--
They are most deceived that trusteth most in themselves.
|
|
