Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Ian Murdock: Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers

  • Subject: Re: [News] Ian Murdock: Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers
  • From: "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:33:03 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <3141668.91Ao4eRhf2@schestowitz.com>
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Slated.org
  • References: <3141668.91Ao4eRhf2@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070302 Fedora/1.5.0.10-1.fc6 pango-text Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:516846
Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
> Debian's Ian Speaks: Gaining Developer Mindshare Is Key
> 
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | "Sun's Linux strategy is not well articulated. People who ask why I'm
> | at Sun say, 'I thought Sun was anti-Linux.' That's not true at all.

No, just anti-GPL. Is there a difference?

> | Solaris is the operating system of choice

<This comment intentionally left blank>

-- 
K.
http://slated.org

.----
| I found [Vista] to be a dangerously unstable operating system,
| which has caused me to lose data ... unfortunately this product
| is unfit for any user. - [H]ardOCP, <http://tinyurl.com/3bpfs2>
`----

Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.20-1.2312.fc5
 09:28:39 up 6 days,  7:00,  2 users,  load average: 0.84, 0.75, 0.73

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index