____/ Dean G. on Tuesday 31 July 2007 21:57 : \____
> On Jul 30, 4:29 pm, "amicus_curious" <A...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "dapunka" <dapu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1185820554.332073.76270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 30 Jul, 19:14, "amicus_curious" <A...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> "7" <website_has_em...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:palri.6929$By5.2876@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> J.. j.. j..
>> >> justaminute!.. Why is windopz the OS deleting
>> >> > Linux MBRs off servers?
>>
>> >> > More than 50% of all servers run Linux!
>>
>> >> > Surely this is subject of anti-trust / anti-competitive behaviour?
>>
>> >> > Companies that have their Linux MBRs deleted should be able
>> >> > to get massive refunds for damage caused by windopz OSen
>> >> > to their Linux servers.
>>
>> >> > Class action suit and thus rebates and a promise
>> >> > to eliminate the practice in both server rooms and any PC
>> >> > for any reason is needed.
>>
>> >> Apparently your prior education has been insufficient to alert you to the
>> >> fact that Microsoft's monopoly power was only found to be in regard to
>> >> desktop client PC OS. They can do anything they want with servers as
>> >> long
>> >> as they are not leveraging from desktops.
>>
>> > Is that right? Did the courts tell Microsoft that they "can do
>> > anything they want with servers"? Or did God tell Gates in a dream?
>>
>> You are being silly. Judge Jacksons himself, no Microsoft fan, said that
>> Linux was insignificant and had no bearing on the desktop. Windows servers
>> are not a monopoly.
>
> One does not need to be a monopoly to be guilty of anti-competative
> behavior.
They are "dumping" and tweaking figures in servers. Anti-competitive for sure.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | GPL'd Othello: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
run-level 2 2007-06-16 18:32 last=
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
|
|
