Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Same Games and Programs Suck up Much More Memory in Vista Than in XP

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Same Games and Programs Suck up Much More Memory in Vista Than in XP
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:18:08 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
A Messy Transition (Part 3): Vista Buys Some Time

,----[ Quote ]
| Under Vista the game is still using an additional 160MB of virtual address 
| space compared to XP, but this is far better than the gap being the entire 
| size of the video memory on our 8800GTX prior to the hotfix.  
`----

http://www.anandtech.com/systems/showdoc.aspx?i=3060&p=2


Related:

Buying a new PC? 'Windows Vista Capable' barely hits the mark

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft's on-the-box minimum RAM requirement "really isn't
| realistic," according to David Short, an IBM consultant who works
| in its company's Global Services Divison. He says users should
| consider 4GB of RAM if they really want optimum Vista performance.
| With 512MB of RAM, Vista will deliver performance that's
| "sub-XP," he warned.
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9011523
http://tinyurl.com/2x29tu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index