"[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> writes:
> Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>
>> More Irregularities in the OOXML ISO Process Surface
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | If you read about what happened there in that article, "OOXML in Norway: The
>> | haywire process," your jaw will simply drop. I do think there is something
>> | the matter with the ISO process if this is how it works.
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070827111019189
>
> Jesus - this is serious. I knew there was, as Groklaw puts it, some
> "shenanigans" going on WRT OOXML, i.e. lobbying etc., but /this/ is
> completely out of control! This is corruption in a very real sense,
> right at the core of the standardisation process.
>
> I haven't really been following this process very closely, because
> despite the importance of promoting ODF over OOXML, frankly the waiting
> and the bureaucracy bores me to tears, but I'll be sure to scrutinise
> every move from now on, you can be sure.
>
> I find it amazing that the Microsoft Mafia are putting so much muscle
> into shoehorning this "standard" into society. Their cash cows must be
> in need of a good feeding.
Quick - blog it on your slated.org snore fest. Just by where you accuse
MS of murdering children with their X-Box.
Tell me, is there anything you like and enjoy? You don't do martial arts
and have a gun license I hope?
--
Por que os advogados não vão à praia?
R: Para os gatos não enterrarem eles.
|
|
