Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:14:27 +0200, Peter K?hlmann wrote:
>
>> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:05:33 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> SCO Could Face Cash Crunch After Novell Trial
>>>
>>> Why is it, Roy, that when you see a headline that says "X could be Y" you
>>> immediately rewrite it as "X IS Y"?
>>>
>>> You do this all the time. This isn't an error or a mistake. You are
>>> deliberately changing the meaning of the articles you are stealing.
>>
>> Oh, tell us Erik what is wrong with the statement that SCO is now in serious
>> trouble?
>
> Whether or not they they are, the fact is that the article Roy was quoting
> said "could be" not "is".
>
>> And would you please provide any indication at all why providing links
>> is "stealing"?
>
> He doesn't attribute where he finds them. Most of the time, he lifts them
> from other sites that have done the hard work of tracking them down, he
> comes along, reposts them, without giving any credit to those people that
> help him.
>
Actually, you stupid fuck, he snags a good portion of them from Digg.
Don't you have some toner to go change?
>> As usual, you are one of the most dishonest twits on usenet. You have not
>> changed at all. You are still scum
>
> As usual, you condone unethical behavior because it is in line with your
> beliefs.
Ethical behavior like offering microsoft free shill services?
-----yttrx
--
http://www.yttrx.net
|
|
