Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Review of Debian Derivative and Reviewing the Rise of PCLinuxOS

  • Subject: [News] Review of Debian Derivative and Reviewing the Rise of PCLinuxOS
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:49:41 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Sidux 2007-03 Review.

,----[ Quote ]
| Sidux is a desktop-oriented distribution and comes with as a live CD.Its 
| based on the unstable branch of Debian GNU/Linux. It was originally created 
| by a group of developers who split from the KANOTIX project and launched 
| their own distribution. Sidux has a relatively speedy release cycle.   
`----

http://simplyjat.blogspot.com/2007/08/title-sidux-2007.html

PCLinuxOS gaining more popularity than Ubuntu?

,----[ Quote ]
| This may not be as absurd a claim as you may think, especially when you take 
| into consideration the minor backlash that Ubuntu has experienced. So is 
| PCLinuxOS the next poster-child of usable Linux?   
`----

http://www.seopher.com/articles/pclinuxos_gaining_more_popularity_than_ubuntu_


Related:

PCLinuxOS: Linux Distribution

,----[ Quote ]
| One notable difference from Mandriva is the program used to install 
| extra software. We found this much easier to use and includes useful 
| software such as graphics drivers.
| 
| Unlike some other distributions, PCLinuxOS can play back 
| proprietary multimedia files (including wma, mp3, mpg, rm, 
| mov) without having to install extra software. DVD playback 
| software is not included but can be installed with the 
| standard installation tool.
`----

http://www.computeractive.co.uk/computeractive/downloads/2191819/pclinuxos-linux-distribution


Review: PcLinuxOS 2007 

,----[ Quote ]
| While PcLinuxOS does still have a bit of growing to do, out of all the
| linux distributions out there, I'd easily rate this one as the best in 
| every way because of all that it does, how easy it is to use, how ready
| it is to use out of the box, and most especially in the area of 
| appeasing both camps, the new user and the experienced user.
`----

http://www.raiden.net/?cat=2&aid=249


PClinuxOS 2007.0 Review

,----[ Quote ]
| I am a Kubuntu user since version 6.06. However, that hasn't made
| me blindly consider (k)ubuntu to be the best linux distro; I am
| always open to newcomers. In recent days, PClinuxOS 2007.0 was 
| released, and quickly hit the top of of the distrowatch charts.
| I decided to download it and give this relatively new distribution
| a text run on my Acer Aspire 5050 laptop, nicknamed the geebee.
`----

http://nosrednaekim.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/pclinuxos-20070-review/


Screenshots of Sidux 2007-03 preview1

,----[ Quote ]
| By the way, another improvement  seen in sidux 2007-03 preview1 is the fonts 
| used. 
| 
| The Bitstream Vera Sans 11  is  definitely  better!   Just  visit the 
| Distrowatch  with  the Iceweasal browser.  
`----

http://www.linuxseekers.com/content/view/159/1/


Sidux 2007-02 - A Review

,----[ Quote ]
| Simply put, Sidux 2007-02 was a pleasure to use. The live CD 
| worked beautifully, as did the installer. The desktop is very 
| dark, but this is nice to see after using so many “light” distributions.
`----

http://shiftbackspace.com/2007/06/29/sidux-2007-02-a-review/


sidux 2007-02

,----[ Quote ]
| After 3 months of development we are proud to announce the
| immediate availability of the sidux-2007-02...
`----

http://sidux.com/Article236.html


sidux 2007-02 Preview 1 Screenshot Tour

,----[ Quote ]
| What's on the menu: Debian sid, up to date as of 2007-05-13; kernel
| 2.6.21.1 (SMP, voluntary preemption, mac80211); minimal, but fully
| functional KDE 3.5.6 (en + de); completely overhauled early boot
| sequence; largely adapted installer and graphical installer 
| front-end; enhanced installer for meta tasks; new artwork;o
| ffline manual...
`----

http://osdir.com/Article9846.phtml


Sidux: A live CD for Debian unstable

,----[ Quote ]
| It's a rare distribution that impresses me before I've even tried it,
| but sidux did just that when, a few hours after I'd downloaded and
| burned a two-day-old preview release, the project announced that the
| next release was available for download.
`----

http://distrocenter.linux.com/distrocenter/07/02/28/1017239.shtml?tid=127


SIDUX 2007-01 Linux LiveCD

,----[ Quote ]
| Screenshots gallery
`----

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=655&num=1


Testdriving Sidux 2007

,----[ Quote ]
| Sidux ships with a 2.6.20 kernel, Xorg 7.1.1, gcc 4.1.2, and KDE
| 3.5.5. Iceweasel 2.0.0.1 appears to be the default browser and
| OpenOffice.org is only at version 2.0.4. Besides what appears to
| be most of the KDE apps, other apps include The Gimp, Amarok,
| K3B, Kaffine, Scribus, XFMedia player, and Inkscape. There are a
| few system configuration tools, but not a lot. Ksensors is
| available through apt-get.
`----

http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/13870


sidux -- a new star in the Linux galaxy

,----[ Quote ]
| What's most impressive: the huge amount of user documentation
| their documentation and translation teams have managed to write
| up in the short amount of time (the sidux user manual is currently
| available in English as well as Danish, Kroatian, Spanish and
| German).
`----

http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2691


sidux 2007-01 release

,----[ Quote ]
| sidux is a full featured Debian Sid based live CD with a special
| focus on hard disk installations, a clean upgrade path within 
| Sid and additional hard- and software support.
`----

http://sidux.com/Article116.html


Sidux vs. Mint: Can You Live the Pure Open Source Life?

,----[ Quote ]
| There are valid and compelling reasons why one might want to use only 
| Open Source Software. Avoids any patent or IP legal issues, better 
| security, and encourages innovation are just a few. However, on the 
| other side of the argument there are justifiable reasons for the 
| inclusion of multimedia codecs, proprietary drivers, and closed 
| software in modern Linux distributions. Neither side is wrong.
`----

http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/16952

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index