Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Juniper Tries to Battle GNU/Linux Routers with Deception

  • Subject: [News] Juniper Tries to Battle GNU/Linux Routers with Deception
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:32:53 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Juniper challenged to post router code on Web

,----[ Quote ]
| A networking industry exec has challenged Juniper to post its operating 
| system source code on the Internet, and stop hiding behind legalese and 
| paperwork.  
| 
| Dave Roberts, strategy VP at open-source router firm Vyatta, said Juniper's 
| claim that it is opening JUNOS to third-parties is "full of bunk" and 
| is "simply big companies being 'open' with other big companies and then 
| putting out press releases."    
`----

http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php?id=218234079&rid=-50


Related:

Using open source as a marketing ploy

,----[ Quote ]
| This is typical trend riding fluff. If you go the Aras website you
| read about "Microsoft Enterprise Open Source Solutions", which is
| comical in and of itself.
`----

http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/more_open_sourc.html


Soft sell for open source apps

,----[ Quote ]
| When vendors aren't counting licenses, they're free to concentrate on 
| quality code
| 
| [...]
| 
| Schroer says there's no contradiction between open source and the
| Microsoft software ecosystem. "Microsoft has a particular business
| model that works for them. But around that they're encouraging open
| source development," he explains.
`----

http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/01/15/03OPopenent_1.html


How to Jump on the Open Access Bandwagon By Doing Absolutely Nothing 

,----[ Quote ]
| Earlier this morning, the interweb was aflutter with various reports that 
| AT&T had, in the words of a USA Today article, "flung open its network" to 
| any and all devices. Problem was, this revelation was based solely on the 
| aforementioned article, and the assumption many had (and still seem to have) 
| was that AT&T had in fact changed its network policy in some way. As many 
| have noticed, nothing in fact has changed, other than the fact that AT&T got 
| a healthy dose of positive press out of the misrepresentation.      
`----

http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/12/how-to-jump-on.html


AT&T admits it censored other bands

,----[ Quote
| It looks like Pearl Jam isn't the only band that has had its politically 
| charged comments bleeped from concerts streamed from AT&T's Blue Room Web 
| site.  
| 
| [...]
| 
| AT&T quickly apologized for the incident and blamed the company that handles 
| the Webcasting for performances on Blue Room. 
`----

http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9759184-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20


Customers can sue AT&T, after all

,----[ Quote ]
| A federal court in San Francisco has decided that AT&T's wireless contract 
| is "unconscionable". 
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/20/court_slames_att_wireless_contract_clause/


AT&T takes another step towards filtered network with investment in Vobile

,----[ Quote ]
| AT&T announced earlier this year that was planning to introduce content 
| filtering of some sort for all video passing across its network. Exactly what 
| AT&T was thinking remained unclear: would the company truly attempt to 
| reassemble the fragments of peer-to-peer transmissions, then extract video 
| from all sorts of different codecs, then attempt to match it-in real time-to 
| some database of copyrighted works? Would such a thing even be possible?     
`----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071114-att-takes-another-step-towards-filtered-network-with-investment-in-vobile.html
http://tinyurl.com/3a998z


When Networks Collide: AT&T suddenly doesn't like Apple so much.

,----[ Quote ]
| What I believe is troubling the relationship between AT&T and Apple is the 
| upcoming auction for 700-MHz wireless spectrum and AT&T's discovery that -- 
| as I have predicted for weeks -- Apple will be joining Google in bidding. 
| AT&T thought its five-year "exclusive" iPhone agreement with Apple would have 
| precluded such a bid, but that just shows how poorly Randall Stephenson 
| understood Steve Jobs. Steve always hurts his friends to see how much they 
| really love him, so AT&T probably should have expected this kind of corporate 
| body blow.       
`----

http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20071129_003521.html


Hey, AT&T, What's the Value of a Closed Network Again?

,----[ Quote ]
| Closed networks, its proponents maintain, offer a trade-off. Individuals or 
| outside developers can't make any changes or improvements to it. But since 
| the network and its applications are controlled at a single source, 
| individuals are supposed to get an easier experience in which they don't have 
| to think about the network, just what they're doing on it. Trust the network.    
`----

http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/11/hey_att_whats_t.html


How AT&T chewed up, and spat out Net Neutrality

,----[ Quote ]
| In an interview with Business Week in October 2005, Whitacre said
| he thought taking over BellSouth would be rejected by the FCC.
| He also made another memorable comment that began the process
| which culminated in the FCC's approval in December.
`----

http://www.theregister.com/2007/01/10/whitacre_wins_big/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index