Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Best "small system" x86 Linux desktop distro for light office / programming tasks is...?

  • Subject: Re: Best "small system" x86 Linux desktop distro for light office / programming tasks is...?
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:42:52 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Netscape
  • References: <1170864069.759861.159500@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <1170864495.500031.51830@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com> <1170868074.943138.243250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ 486box ] on Wednesday 07 February 2007 17:07 \__

> On Feb 7, 11:08 am, "raylopez99" <raylope...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 8:01 am, "raylopez99" <raylope...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>>
>> > I was going to just buy the lastest RedHat for the desktop CD for my
>> > old Pentium II, but I'll ask the group first: what's the best 'minimum
>> > hardware' desktop x86 processor Linux distro?
>>
>> Well, I just checked the system requirements for Linspire, and that
>> distro sure will not work.  Hope the others are not the same, but I'm
>> not holding my breath.
>>
> 
> Well, Linspire is a rather bloated distro. I would off-handedly say
> Elive, or Debian if you're familiar with Linux. Damn Small Linux is
> good, and I think that that or Elive would fit your described system
> best. They are both low-hardware-req. distros, unlike Linspire, which
> is only for newer PCs.
> Links:
> www.damnsmalllinux.org
> www.debian.org
> http://www.elivecd.org/
> 
>>Thanks in advance!
> Always glad to help.
> 
>>BTW, years ago I posted here flaming Linux users.  I have since
>>mellowed, only because I realized Linux is no longer a serious threat
>>to MSFT (I'm a shareholder).  Now, with the MSFT-Novell hookup, if
>>anything I pity you guys!   Hahaha!
> 
> It might be, it might not. I don't really care about Microsoft, I just
> want to make sure there's enough Linux users for developing to
> continue.
> And we don't really need pity, we won't be going away anytime soon.
> Just don't flame, and we'll be polite. (The real advocates anyway, not
> necessarily so-called 'advocates' like 7, DFS, Flatfish++, etc, etc.)

There are rare occasions when 7 does proper advocacy. The rest don't even
pretend to be advocates. They have a bully's complex.

-- 
                        ~~ Best wishes 

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    Coffee makes mw to0 jittery
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 119 total,   1 running, 115 sleeping,   0 stopped,   3 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index