Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My interpretation of this was poor and I kind of blame a blurb that pointed
> me at a homepage which did not contain an announcement (trust me, I
> navigated a bit to find a clue). It turns out to be just an
> alternative/equivalent.
No problem, the smithproject.org website was illuminating enough. I've
a client that is looking to migrate some CF sites to non-proprietary
technology, and this might offer a path they hadn't considered. I have
a 3pm telecon with them and will make a point to mention it.
Thanks again,
Thad
|
|
