Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <1170596040.368086.162590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "cc" <scatnubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> You can post "anonymous" emails all you like, but if there is no way
>> of verifying it then it's useless.
>
> Maybe Roy has learned that posting checkable claims doesn't work, since
> there are some people here who will actually check.
>
Really? And /you/ are one of those?
Strange that you never bothered to check posts of Erik F, flatfish, Hadron
Quark, DFS or other assorted windows using scum
--
All things are possible, except skiing thru a revolving door.
|
|