Enterprise Unix Roundup: Oracle, Enterprise Linux Pioneer?
,----[ Quote ]
| Under no circumstances should it be thought that Oracle is doing
| this out of any sense of altruism, and therein lies the rub.
| Oracle wants to knock Red Hat off the top of the enterprise Linux mountain
| -- no ifs, ands, or buts. And, if Mickos is correct, it will want to
| do the same to MySQL. Even with selfish motivations, Oracle may have
| stumbled on the formula that only FLOSS allows.
`----
http://www.serverwatch.com/eur/article.php/3657116
Walli: Oracle Doesn't Get It
,----[ Quote ]
| Walli says if Oracle is seriously considering a MySQL support
| service, the database giant ?really, really? doesn?t get it.
| In doing so, the company would be offering its customers a
| competing product that is, in fact, better than its own
| products, for a fraction of the cost. What could that do,
| Walli asks, but destroy Oracle?s own installation base?
`----
http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/osb/index.php/2007/01/31/walli-oracle-doesnt-get-it/
Related:
Oracle Adds Tools to Unbreakable Linux Program
,----[ Quote ]
| Following up announcement of its "Unbreakable Linux" program
| last fall, Oracle Corp has unveiled extensions for its
| Enterprise manager administration tool, which will be
| bundled into two of its three Linux support tiers.
|
| [...]
|
| But during a recent earning call, Oracle president Charles Phillips
| reported 9000 downloads. As we reported back then, during a comparable
| period, Novell's SuSE Linux was hit for 325,000 downloads, while Red Hat's
| non-commercial Fedora Core 6 had an average of 12,500 installations per day
| in its first month.
`----
http://www.computerwire.com/industries/research/?pid=41CE60EA%2D3C79%2D418F%2D9989%2D0AF704D3BBAE
Will Oracle launch Unbreakable MySQL?
,----[ Quote ]
| "They have hinted to us that they will," said Mickos, indicating
| that the database giant is planning to repeat its October 2006
| Unbreakable Linux plan, which saw it undercut Red Hat with
| enterprise Linux support.
`----
http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2007/01/will_oracle_lau.html
EnterpriseDB goes after Oracle's European users
,----[ Quote ]
| EnterpriseDB, the open source database company nipping at Oracle's
| heals in the US, is today expected to open its first European sales
| offices in the UK. The opening follows this month's Asia Pacific
| expansion in Hong Kong.
|
| [...]
|
| EnterpriseDB claimed 100 customers during 2006 with growing traction
| among the Oracle base. Earlier this month Enterprise announced new
| support for its PostgreSQL database starting at $1,500 per CPU and
| topping out at $3,000.
`----
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/26/enterprisedb_european_office/
Customer Backlash Against Oracle's Buggy Linux Product?
,----[ Quote ]
| And there is other feedback showing that Oracle's Linux is extremely buggy,
| and it keeps crashing, and Oracle has generated quite a bit of backlash and
| animosity from the broader open source community towards Oracle. So, I
| guess the question is, is it realistic to think that Oracle is just going
| to ride this experiment into the ground, or would you expect them to
| possibly withdraw their offering from the marketplace?
`----
http://biz.yahoo.com/seekingalpha/061222/22921_id.html?.v=1
Oracle's Offering and Red Hat's Response
,----[ Quote ]
| You may wish to view Larry Ellison's keynote for yourself, in which he
| cited the SCO Group's litigation, believe it or not, claiming it is
| holding back Linux adoption in the enterprise... The vendors aren't
| offering indemnification, Ellison said, and because of SCO, there's
| all this uncertainty and doubt about intellectual property. He says he
| will offer indemnification. In the Q&A at the end, he was asked if
| Oracle was planning to buy SCO to bring that uncertainty to an end.
| No, was the answer.
|
| If he thought they were going to be victorious, he'd buy them in a
| New York minute. No uncertainty or doubt about that. So who is he
| kidding?
|
| Red Hat already has their response on their website, with a big sign
| on their homepage that reads: "Unfakeable Linux - Red Hat responds."
| The most important thing they say is that it's not true that you must
| upgrade to the most recent version to get support, as Elliso
| claimed in his speech.
|
| [...]
|
| Making Linux more successful in the enterprise is the right goal. But
| not if you kill off what makes Linux desirable, namely ethics. It's the
| value add of FOSS, and if the corporate guys don't figure that out soon,
| they really will kill the Golden Goose. Let me explain in one sentence
| why:
|
| Cut throat competition destroys software.
|
| The Open Source process is built on the the same principles that work
| in any scientific environment. You share knowledge. You cooperate.
| Business always wants to balkanize. They very nearly killed Unix
| doing exactly that. And here they go with Linux, trying the same
| stupid thing.
`----
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061026013857159
PostgreSQL 8.2 Closes The Gap
,----[ Quote ]
| The release is an effort to close the gap on a performance and
| functionality basis between PostgreSQL and its competitive
| proprietary counterparts such as Oracle, IBM's DB2 and Microsoft's
| SQL Server.
`----
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3647376
Vonage's Open Source Database Odyssey
,----[ Quote ]
| VoIP vendor Vonage Networks is deploying EnterpriseDB, which is built
| on top of the open source PostgreSQL database as an alternative to
| Oracle. EnterpriseDB Advanced Server adds Oracle compatibility to
| native PostgreSQL as well as performance improvements.
`----
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3644946
EnterpriseDB makes big strides in database world
,----[ Quote ]
| EnterpriseDB that month also won US$20 million (NZ$29 million) in
| financing, bringing the total amount of financing it has received
| up to US$28.5 million.
`----
http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/tech/FC9D352BF6C0EE57CC25722F0081B398
PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle: Enterprise-ready and able to compete
,----[ Quote ]
| Why are you paying so much in licensing costs and annual maintenance when
| you could use PostgreSQL for free, and get community support and upgrades
| for free as well? This is the question that Neil Matthew and Richard
| Stones pose to smaller companies regarding their less critical
| applications.
`----
http://searchopensource.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1222466,00.html
Unbreakable Linux still unproven, analyst warns
,----[ Quote ]
| IT managers running Red Hat Linux should think carefully before
| making the switch to Unbreakable Linux, the new Linux distribution
| that Oracle Corp. announced last month.
`----
http://searchopensource.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1233083,00.html
Oracle F2Q07 (Qtr End 11/30/06) Earnings Call Transcript
,----[ Quote ]
| In the first 30 days, we had 9,000 downloads of Unbreakable Linux
| from our website and hundreds of customers connecting their servers
| to our network.
`----
http://seekingalpha.com/article/22626
Oracle up to bat: Red Hat bashing possible
,----[ Quote ]
| In what's expected to be an otherwise so-so second quarter report, Oracle
| may shed some light on its two-month-old plan to support Red Hat Linux.
|
| [...]
|
| The wild-card in all this is Oracle's take on its Linux support
| initiative and what that means for Red Hat. Now it is possible
| Oracle won't mention Linux, but typically Larry Ellison slaps
| some rival around and talking trash against SAP has got to be
| getting old.
`----
http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4161
|
|
