Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Microsoft Patents Phishing Site Identification

Microsoft Applies For Patent Telling You If A Website Is On A List Of
Phishing Sites

,----[ Quotebb ]
| It seems that every few days when new patents are announced there are
| a few gems from Microsoft. Take, for example, Microsoft's latest
| patent application on Phishing Detection, Prevention, and Notification...
| Update: Clarifying that this is simply a patent application, not a
| granted patent -- but the fact that Microsoft even thinks it's
| worth applying for such a patent highlights the way the system
| works these days.
`----

http://techdirt.com/articles/20070216/013012.shtml


Related:

Patenting Life 

,----[ Quote ]
| You, or someone you love, may die because of a gene patent that should
| never have been granted in the first place. Sound far-fetched?
| Unfortunately, it's only too real.
`----

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/13/opinion/13crichton.html?_r=1&oref=slogin


Features: Open-Source Software: Who Needs Intellectual Property?

,----[ Quote ]
| The market for open-source software--uncopyrighted, freely
| reproducible computer programs--is not well understood by economists.
| A central source of surprise is that innovation can thrive in a
| market without traditional intellectual property (IP). But as we
| argued in a 2005 unpublished paper, "Perfectly Competitive Innovation,"
| as a matter of theory there is no reason to believe that monopoly
| power through IP is needed for innovation. The market for
| open-source software is the poster child for this perspective. 
| 
| First, understand that the market for open-source software is a
| classic example of a competitive market. It is characterized by
| the voluntary renunciation of copyright and patent. Buyers are
| entitled to make their own copies, modified or not, and sell them. 
`----

http://www.fee.org/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=6608


No trust in intellectual property

,----[ Quote ]
| This is why I've argued before that open source is hugely amenable to
| trust. You can see the code. You know exactly what I have before
| you try to engage with me as a partner, customer, or competitor.
| And just because you can see what I have doesn't mean you
| necessarily have the right (or, at least, the right as you would
| prefer to have it) to use that software. Absolute transparency
| while still retaining the ability to profit.
`----

http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/02/no_trust_in_int.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index