In comp.os.linux.advocacy cc <scatnubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 10:12 am, y...@xxxxxxxxx (yttrx) wrote:
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy cc <scatnu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 17, 7:05 pm, y...@xxxxxxxxx (yttrx) wrote:
>> >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Ron Hollinger <holli...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >> > yttrx wrote:
>>
>> >> >>> Tags for search engines: yttrx, liar, paranoid, credibility,
>> >> >>> pathetic, job, HR, human resources, employment, job, hire, interview,
>> >> >>> background check, background investigation, character,
>> >> >>> castration,testicles,
>> >> >>> faggot,homosexual,blowjob,thief,crook,plagerize,bonesmoker,bum,girl,fem,
>> >> >>> transvestite,transexual,tranny,ac/dc,metro,weirdo,gay,linux user, crib notes.
>>
>> >> >> First, you're getting a few COLA denizens mixed up, and I'm one
>> >> >> of them.
>>
>> >> > Corrected as required.
>>
>> >> Yeah, because I'm a college student in england.
>>
>> >> You stupid fuck.
>>
>> > It's obvious you have the reading comprehension of a 5 year old and
>> > are too stupid to understand what he posted. Now go ahead and respond
>> > with some made up credentials about how you dropped out of an ivy
>> > league school and know everything because your job fucking kicks ass.
>> > Fucking posers make me sick.
>>
>> Aaaaas ive said to everyone else, you pathetic little fuck, you're more
>> than welcome to come visit me in NYC any time you want, and you get
>> the same offer that everyone does, I'll buy you lunch.
>>
>> Don't believe me? Come see for yourself.
>
>
> Why? So I can see either:
> a. You have a job, which means what? You're still a dumbass who's
> wrong more often than not and won't admit it. Doesn't change your
> poser status.
> b. There is no job, which means what? You're still a dumbass who's
> wrong more often than not and won't admit it. Doesn't change your
> poser status.
>
Well you'd be able to freely peruse the physical documentation of my
qualifications, surely.
> Having or not having a job or an office is not the issue. You saying I
> know I'm right because I've been doing it 20 years even when proven
> wrong, and bring out that same tired shit every time like it fucking
> means something is the issue. The epitome of a poser.
>
Uh huh. So you can't quote me.
>> And I didn't say I knew everything, can you quote me on that?
>>
>> And did I say that my current job "fucking kicks ass"? Care
>> to quote me on that as well?
>
>
> I know this is hard for you to grasp, but there's a difference between
> a direct quote and an interpretation of what you write. When you write
> things like (and I'm paraphrasing here) "I've been working with
> [insert whatever you want to feel smart about] for 20 years..." and
> generally fail to admit you're wrong even when proven otherwise, well
> I interpret that as you believing you know everything.
>
Uh huh. So, paraphrasing from what appears to be a memory of at least
some want, taking out of context, and refusing to actually quote me.
So, that's a pretty flimsy point you got there, huh.
>> Sounds to me like you have a little self-esteem problem there, buddy.
>> Let's just keep that your problem, and not mine, k? k.
>>
>
> Sounds like it's already your problem.
>
Ah, so your self-esteem problem is now my problem?
The interesting here is that I really didn't have to say anything
insulting at all...you're already an expert at making yourself look
like a fucking retard.
-----yttrx
--
http://www.yttrx.net
|
|
