Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Linux Does Lasers

  • Subject: Re: Linux Does Lasers
  • From: "spam" <gtdavies33@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 17 Feb 2007 16:26:51 -0800
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
  • In-reply-to: <1o2m5wetjodzh$.dlg@funkenbusch.com>
  • Injection-info: t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=142.58.53.152; posting-account=Wo4F5A0AAAAJ-H4UZNAQQNV97mCPOD8e
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <1721163.ttpHc8PWL7@schestowitz.com> <nf18kyjzksr4.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <-_KdnTT6y7Bl4UrYnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@speakeasy.net> <1o2m5wetjodzh$.dlg@funkenbusch.com>
  • User-agent: G2/1.0
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:495819
On Feb 17, 3:14 pm, Erik Funkenbusch <e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:08:55 -0800, John Bailo wrote:
> > Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
> >> .NET... you know, Microsoft's technology that they standardized?
>
> > They "proposed" a standard...not the same.
>
> No.  It *IS* a standard.  ECMA and ISO.
>
> > BTW -- VB.NET usage down 30% last year...
>
> Based on what?

And what percentage of MS's .NET is a ECMA and ISO standard?
10%-12%-15%?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index