In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:01:49 +0000
<29306184.HQQ5fmCReL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> __/ [ Linonut ] on Saturday 10 February 2007 18:09 \__
>
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, The Ghost In The Machine belched out this bit
>> o' wisdom:
>>
>>>> Kernel Comparison for Linux (2.6.18) verses Windows (2003 R2)
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>> | Architectures: Linux Windows
>>>> | PC x86 Y Y
>>>> | PC AMD64 Y Y
>>>> | PC IA-64 Y Y
>>>> | Alpha Y N
>>>> | PPC Y N
>>>> | PPC64 Y N
>>>> | SPARC32 Y N
>>>> | SPARC64 Y N
>>>> | ARM Y N
>>>> | HP PA-RISC Y N
>>>> | Moto 680x0 Y N
>>>> | MIPS Y N
>>>> | MIPS (DEC) Y N
>>>> | PowerPC Y N
>>>> | IBM S/390 Y N
>>>> | Cell Y N
>>>> | others Y N
>>>>
>>>> http://widefox.pbwiki.com/Kernel%20Comparison%20Linux%20vs%20Windows
>>>
>>> I thought Windows NT had PPC at one point...? But yeah, this is great
>>> stuff, especially for the non-desktop markets. :-)
>>
>> Windows NT used to run on Alpha and MIPS, too.
>
> And there I was thinking that Windows NT /was/ alpha.
>
It was alpha, it ran on Alpha, then they dumped Alpha,
and now it's *still* alpha.
:-)
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is it cheaper to learn Linux, or to hire someone
to fix your Windows problems?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
