Hans Schneider wrote:
> RonB <ronb02nospam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:08:31 -0800, Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Aren't you bothered by the inaccuracies? Roy has a tendency to write
>>> subject lines and summaries that misrepresent what the linked article
>>> actually says. If you follow the links and read the stories, that's not
>>> much of a problem, but the natural tendency would be to become lazy, and
>>> just take the out-of-context quote and Roy's summary and headline, and
>>> then *think* you've got the story.
>>
>> I haven't seen the inaccuracies you speak of but I don't follow every
>> story to its link.
>
> So your comments are worthless. At least 30% of his comments are being
> totally not accurate for the articles. You closing your eyes does not be
> making his spam any more of the accuracy level.
So you accuse Roy of "spamming" the group with inaccurate posts.
Even though nearly all linux advocates have asked him to even *increase* the
numbers
Yet 100% of flatfish posts are lies and totally inaccurate. Same for DFS and
you, Hadron
But nobbody of you windows using scum ever complains about this garbage and
the impersonations so frequently done by the windows using cola posters,
who, without any exception, are worthless road kill at best
--
I say you need to visit Clues 'R' Us. They are having a special on
slightly used clues.
|
|
